Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dan Marino Starting College For Developmentally Disabled

B.J. Penn doesn't care about Zuffa's Sponsorship Bans

Zuffa forgot that "Banned" means "wear it" in Hawaiian.

When RVCA sponsored Fedor it came as no surprise that Zuffa banned their fighters from wearing the RVCA ban. Apparently B.J. Penn lost the memo or just doesn't care enough to read it.

MiddleEasy reports that Penn plans on wearing the brand when he walks out to The Octagon to fight Diego Sanchez at UFC 107.

RVCA has already made BJ Penn's walk-out shirt for UFC 107 and the dude has every intention on wearing it at UFC 107. Not only that, but he's selling them out of a hotel in Memphis, Tennessee (and if you want one, Penn said dial 808-864-3995 and ask for Lorraine).

WKR isn't so sure that Penn will actually wear the RVCA shirt and if he does we wouldn't be surprised if there was no RVCA logo on the shirt. But this issue begs the question what would the UFC do if a fighter put on a banned shirt before heading out to fight?

Would they go to the nuclear option and call the fight? Or do they have a mercenary army of enforcers to remove clothes from an MMA fighter because that is a fight WKR would pay to see.

SBN coverage of UFC 107: Penn vs. Sanchez

Comment 14 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

All I know is that RVCA and the UFC had some talks after they were banned, I believe around UFC 106. Not sure if maybe they “worke something out” in time for BJ to wear RVCA.

by MMASuPreMaCy on Dec 9, 2009 3:20 PM EST reply actions  

Well

Guess they didn’t work out their differences.
=)

by MMASuPreMaCy on Dec 10, 2009 7:31 PM EST up reply actions  

rcva was/is? litterally plastered all over bj’s site last i looked. bj is a guy who would wear the shirt just to say fu. thats what i love about him.

as for the ban itself, its so childish. all of this childish antics of banning shirts and brands and blacklisting fighters is going to bite them hard in the ass. may not be soon but eventually it will.

@mikefareri on twitter.

by sonofapsycho on Dec 9, 2009 3:20 PM EST reply actions  

I mean it is childish to ban a brand that sponsors a fighter in a diff organization (why not ban TapouT?) but it isn’t childish to not allow rival promotions apparel into the UFC like affliction when they were doing there promoting thing

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Dec 9, 2009 3:22 PM EST up reply actions  

sure the affliction ban was ok especially when they were a rival promotion. but to ban rcva the moment they sponsor fedor? to ban clinch gear in the middle of negotiating with hendo? thats them just being a bully. rcva and clinch gear aren’t putting on any rival mma ppv’s anytime soon.

@mikefareri on twitter.

by sonofapsycho on Dec 9, 2009 3:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Zuffa owns a significant portion of TapOut

That’s why they will never ban TapOut. I wouldn’t be surprised if they are trying to go the Burton Snowboard clothing route, (there are tons of brands of Snowboard clothing but 75% of them are ultimately owned by parent company Burton), and buy out most of TapOut’s competitors then sell them like they are an alternative to TapOut.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Dec 11, 2009 12:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Banning Clinch and RVCA

which are both companies outside of TapOut’s reach of buyout fits perfectly with that. I just did a quick google search and found out Hitman and Premier Fighter are both under the TapOut umbrella already…

Zuffa owns a significant portion of TapOut… So basically Zuffa is trying to corner the market on MMA clothing. If they can’t buy you out they will just ban you.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Dec 11, 2009 12:31 AM EST up reply actions  

bj is a guy who would wear the shirt just to say fu. thats what i love about him.

The UFC banning RCVA and Clinch Gear is basically childish.

Check out my recent MMA drawings on my blog, drop a comment, or subscribe via RSS for updates http://www.scritchandscratch.com/blog/?tag=mma

by VeeisAnimated on Dec 10, 2009 9:18 AM EST up reply actions  

It maybe childish, but It’s Fertittas and Dana company and they could do what they please, whether you agree with it or not. On the other hand, BJ Penn disregarding the ban? Hell yeah! I love it

by The Bronzeville Bully on Dec 9, 2009 4:07 PM EST reply actions  

yes, they do have a right to do it

weird that we we were all demanding that they use that power with Hoelzer but decry it in other situations. Talked about that on Cage Cast (plug!)

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Dec 9, 2009 4:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Joking

Are you comparing working with M-1 to working with Neo-Nazis???

by asa on Dec 9, 2009 5:56 PM EST up reply actions  

 haha, I appreciate the JOKING in bold after the sarcasm flap

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Dec 9, 2009 6:44 PM EST up reply actions  

yus

tell em BJ!

War Bj’s shirt.

by hydras.teeth on Dec 10, 2009 5:19 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Innovative, incisive and independent MMA coverage

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Recent Posts


Managers

65723_10150356329605118_56420715117_16038946_2222608_n_small Zak Woods

Editors

Chicagoatnight1_small Zach Krantz

St6_small David St. Martin

Scmlogo2_small S.C. Michaelson

Contributors

Evan_tanner_small Kaleb Kelchner

Wearealone_small Derek Suboticki