Watch Kalib Run: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Network Message: 50% Off: CBS/SB Nation Fantasy Baseball

Al Turk to appeal loss, major test of legitimacy for Zuffa's commissions

Fighter's Only is reporting that Mustapha Al Turk is appealing his loss to Mirko "Cro Cop" Filipovic. During the fight it appeared that Al Turk was poked in the eye, whether it was intentional or not is disputable. 

Since the fight was in Germany there is no independent athletic commission to arbitrate the appeal. Indeed this is the case for all European UFC events. Zuffa has modeled their European athletic commissions after U.S. athletic commissions, which rely on the 'Unified Rules'. 

MMA Payout breaks down how the appeal should work, 

The standard operating procedure in this situation would have Zuffa as the arbiter of the appeal, in the initial stage, according to the Zuffa Standard Contract:

.........   

The question to ask in this situation is "Is there a sufficient firewall between the person who is acting in the role of commissioner, and the Zuffa brass who are making the monetary/financial decisions?" I would assume in this situation that former head of NSAC Marc Ratner is serving in the Keith Kizer role, or at least he should be.    

I highly suggest that anyone who is interested in how Zuffa's overseas operations work read the post. 

This will be an interesting test of impartiality for Zuffa's European commissions. Since Filipovic left the organization to sign with Dream it stands to reason that a reversal of the fight, or a declaration of no contest, would be met with suspicion and cynicism, maybe even questioning the legitimacy of Zuffa's expansion. Thus it seems logical to expect the arbiters to rule against Al Turk just to avoid such a political dilemma.

For those who see Zuffa's overseas commission work as a farce, the promotion suspended Chris Leben for testing positive for steroids after UFC 89.  

[Update: Note by Zak Woods, 06/15/09 10:27 PM EDT ]

MMA Weekly says no dice on the appeal,

Marc Ratner, UFC Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, Monday told MMAWeekly.com an appeal was not possible.

...........

"In any sport, a judgment call cannot be overturned," he continued. "It's one of those things that happens, but nobody saw it around the Octagon until the replay."  

0 recs  |  Comment 8 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Well, it looks like Zuffa moves fast with these rulings. Referee’s decision stands.

"In any sport, a judgment call cannot be overturned, it’s one of those things that happens, but nobody saw it around the Octagon until the replay."

Straight from the mouth of Marc Ratner, according to MMAWeekly.

by Steve W on Jun 15, 2009 8:30 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

sounds about right.

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Jun 15, 2009 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks for the update was finally able to post it (previous comment from iphone :-p)

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Jun 15, 2009 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No problem, Zak. I also saw over on Cage Potato that the rule of thumb for Zuffa sanctioned events is to follow the NSAC rule book to a T. It makes sense since the NSAC didn’t overturn the Anthony Johnson/Kevin Burns eye poke result.

by Steve W on Jun 16, 2009 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That Burns Johnson decision was horrible. I dont understand how they cant rule that a no contest.

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Jun 16, 2009 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed, and this one wasn’t much better. That’s why I’m a firm believer in instant replay. I can’t think of, at least three fights where it would have been benificial. The two “eye-poke” fights and Marquardt-Lietes. It would’ve shown that the “elbow” wasn’t an illegal blow.

by Steve W on Jun 16, 2009 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ah, but would it have shown the illegal move that Nate wasn’t dinged for? And would the penalty for that foul be retroactively applied?

That’s the only argument against post-fight review that makes me question the good sense of it. It’s not just what you’re looking for in one instant; it’s what else you might find while doing so.

"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."

by AJB on Jun 16, 2009 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you can have instant replay but the language has to be extremely specific and still allow for challenges

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Jun 16, 2009 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Innovative, incisive and independent MMA coverage
Start posting on Watch Kalib Run »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
Gambling on MMA 101
Snapshot_20100105_small
Ultimate Challenge - "The Best of UCMMA"
Mma-lg_small
Calling All Writers: MMA4Real Looking To Hire

Recent FanPosts

Avatar_small
Gambling on MMA 102: Understanding American Odds
Avatar_small
Would BJ Penn moving to 170 be good for the UFC, Penn?
Avatar_small
WEC 47 Poyznus PREDICTIONS
Ar_8_bit_recolored_small
7 Reasons the UFC should sign Epic Beard Man
Nav-logo-hover_small
The Real James Toney: The UFC Brings a Homophobic Monster into their Midst
Logo_small
Mayorga versus Thomas at 160lb Catchweight
K2-xl_small
WKR Imagines the Signing of James Toney

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

K2-xl_small Zak Woods

Contributors

Img_8375_small E. Spencer Kyte

Chicagoatnight1_small Zach Krantz

Pride_fc_2006_openweight_gp_small Nick Becker

Snapshot_20100105_small Chris Shanks