Watch Kalib Run: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Baby Boilers no more: Michigan State-Purdue Preview

Al Turk to appeal loss, major test of legitimacy for Zuffa's commissions

Fighter's Only is reporting that Mustapha Al Turk is appealing his loss to Mirko "Cro Cop" Filipovic. During the fight it appeared that Al Turk was poked in the eye, whether it was intentional or not is disputable. 

Since the fight was in Germany there is no independent athletic commission to arbitrate the appeal. Indeed this is the case for all European UFC events. Zuffa has modeled their European athletic commissions after U.S. athletic commissions, which rely on the 'Unified Rules'. 

MMA Payout breaks down how the appeal should work, 

The standard operating procedure in this situation would have Zuffa as the arbiter of the appeal, in the initial stage, according to the Zuffa Standard Contract:

.........   

The question to ask in this situation is "Is there a sufficient firewall between the person who is acting in the role of commissioner, and the Zuffa brass who are making the monetary/financial decisions?" I would assume in this situation that former head of NSAC Marc Ratner is serving in the Keith Kizer role, or at least he should be.    

I highly suggest that anyone who is interested in how Zuffa's overseas operations work read the post. 

This will be an interesting test of impartiality for Zuffa's European commissions. Since Filipovic left the organization to sign with Dream it stands to reason that a reversal of the fight, or a declaration of no contest, would be met with suspicion and cynicism, maybe even questioning the legitimacy of Zuffa's expansion. Thus it seems logical to expect the arbiters to rule against Al Turk just to avoid such a political dilemma.

For those who see Zuffa's overseas commission work as a farce, the promotion suspended Chris Leben for testing positive for steroids after UFC 89.  

[Update: Note by Zak Woods, 06/15/09 10:27 PM EDT ]

MMA Weekly says no dice on the appeal,

Marc Ratner, UFC Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, Monday told MMAWeekly.com an appeal was not possible.

...........

"In any sport, a judgment call cannot be overturned," he continued. "It's one of those things that happens, but nobody saw it around the Octagon until the replay."  

0 recs  |  Comment 8 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Watch Kalib Run

Cage Cast 64: UFC 109 Recap

Feb 2010 by Zak Woods - 0 comments

LOL UFC 109

Feb 2010 by Zak Woods - 10 comments

Comments

Display:

Well, it looks like Zuffa moves fast with these rulings. Referee’s decision stands.

"In any sport, a judgment call cannot be overturned, it’s one of those things that happens, but nobody saw it around the Octagon until the replay."

Straight from the mouth of Marc Ratner, according to MMAWeekly.

by Steve W on Jun 15, 2009 8:30 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

sounds about right.

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Jun 15, 2009 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks for the update was finally able to post it (previous comment from iphone :-p)

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Jun 15, 2009 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No problem, Zak. I also saw over on Cage Potato that the rule of thumb for Zuffa sanctioned events is to follow the NSAC rule book to a T. It makes sense since the NSAC didn’t overturn the Anthony Johnson/Kevin Burns eye poke result.

by Steve W on Jun 16, 2009 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That Burns Johnson decision was horrible. I dont understand how they cant rule that a no contest.

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Jun 16, 2009 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed, and this one wasn’t much better. That’s why I’m a firm believer in instant replay. I can’t think of, at least three fights where it would have been benificial. The two “eye-poke” fights and Marquardt-Lietes. It would’ve shown that the “elbow” wasn’t an illegal blow.

by Steve W on Jun 16, 2009 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ah, but would it have shown the illegal move that Nate wasn’t dinged for? And would the penalty for that foul be retroactively applied?

That’s the only argument against post-fight review that makes me question the good sense of it. It’s not just what you’re looking for in one instant; it’s what else you might find while doing so.

"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."

by AJB on Jun 16, 2009 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you can have instant replay but the language has to be extremely specific and still allow for challenges

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Jun 16, 2009 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Innovative, incisive and independent MMA coverage
Start posting on Watch Kalib Run »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Catman3_small
On The Spot with Mark Coleman

Recent FanPosts

The-return_small
MMA Fashion Apparel Poll
K2-xl_small
Sengoku News
Gsp123jv7_small
Breaking Down IGN’s First Look of UFC 2010: Undisputed…
Avatar_small
UFC 109: Relentless Predictions
K2-xl_small
Fox Fight Game UFC 109 Preview
The-return_small
UFC Undisputed 2009 Thread
Logo_small
Interview with Season 2 Bellator Fighter Carey Vanier
K2-xl_small
Bellator Announces Ultimate Bet Sponsorship
Death-clutch-brock-lesnar-ufc100-tshirt_small
I was watching ESPN today and I could not help but notice the ESPN ticker

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

K2-xl_small Zak Woods

Contributors

Img_8375_small E. Spencer Kyte

Chicagoatnight1_small Zach Krantz

Pride_fc_2006_openweight_gp_small Nick Becker

Snapshot_20100105_small Chris Shanks