The first MMA beat writer, took long enough
According to Cage Writer mixed martial arts just received its first newspaper beat reporter. The Las Vegas Review-Journal just named Adam Hill as their official MMA beat reporter.
The LVRJ is planning on three MMA stories per week during non-event weeks and is having Hill travel to cover every UFC event domestically and internationally.
While this is fantastic news it also highlights the difficulties that exist within the current media climate. If it took the Las Vegas Review-Journal four years to finally realize the impact of the UFC, whose base of operations is Vegas --approximately half of all UFC events occur in Vegas-- then what does that say about the future of MMA coverage in newspapers around the country? Of course we are not considering newspaper staff reductions and how that affects perceived niche sports, as well as the reality that MMA is banned in New York.
It is no secret that UFC and Zuffa brass expect to be covered as a major event but that expectation hasn't translated into coverage. One of the factors that is often overlooked is the very conception of the sport.
Luke Thomas recently described the difficulties of covering MMA to the SBN community,
MMA is a splintered sport. The universe of fighters, fight locations, countries, promoters, fans, camps, businesses, and the myriad other parties all part of this circus interact is often very complicated, tangential, contradictory and other confusing arrangements. MMA is a moving target both as it grows and fundamentally alters itself. Trying to grab the blade of MMA while it falls is perilous, difficult and even fraught with disaster.
The simple fact of the matter is that the UFC, as a promotion, and MMA as a whole, is perfectly suited for Internet coverage and not newspaper coverage. Part of this simply has to do with age demographics. The UFC is addicted to reminding everyone how well the UFC does with 18-34 demographic. The problem is these people don't buy newspapers and this numbers only reinforce editors decisions to not have consistent coverage.
On the other hand several newspapers have realized that MMA coverage can be an effective part of their Internet product. For instance the Baltimore Sun, USA Today and Houston Chronicle all have MMA blogs. The unfortunate reality is that the very process which helped give birth to the UFC prevents it from obtaining a prominent place within traditional sports media.
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
While I certainly agree with the sentiment that the sports is perfectly suited for Internet coverage and not traditional newspapers, it’s still FANTASTIC to see a story like this.
It takes one for there to be two…
Shamelessly self-promoting since 1997...
by E. Spencer Kyte on Jul 6, 2009 6:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
less and less people read newspapers period, and the observation about our sport and the fact that our base demographic isn’t likely to read newspaper is a great point. boxing hardly makes print unless there’s a death or a mega PPV……and that’s for a sport that has had 100,000 attendees around the turn of the century etc.
Gatti. Dekkers. Pele. Aoki. Kang. Vanderlei.
http://theworldsoldestsport.blogspot.com/
by theworldsoldestsport on Jul 6, 2009 8:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
But this is where I think the UFC has failed with their media strategy. While the vast majority of MMA blogs are amateurs (as in they don’t get paid) if the UFC gave quality blogs credentials we could quickly see a lot of MMA blogs begin local partnerships with newspaper websites.
watchkalibrun.com
by Zak Woods on Jul 6, 2009 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True
In fact, I’ve reached out to three major newspapers in North Carolina in the past year…only for them to reject the offer. It’s all good though…I’ll win in the end :)
http://www.mmaforreal.com
Follow Me On Twitter@MMA4Real
by Kelvin Hunt on Jul 6, 2009 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
UFC will only give a blog credentials if it owns the blog.
I think it’s great that this news is great, but yeah…it took ’em at a minimum 4 years (longer really, imo) to go to print? In Vegas? Sad.
Also – the whole “young males 18-24” demographic I think is OLD data and “they” need to do some more research. “I’ve” been saying that for a year now! I even suggested it to John Prisco at XFC when they had their show here in Knoxville…I mean, they could have easily set a new standard. Didn’t happen. I guess people just don’t like to make changes.
by orlis on Jul 6, 2009 10:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
the problem is that the 18-34 male demographic is highly lucrative. So businesses start salivating when they here something does a good job of brigning out that demo
watchkalibrun.com
by Zak Woods on Jul 7, 2009 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Weird...
I didn’t mean “it’s great that this news is great” I meant “I think this news is great”
…AND I meant 18-34. I really need to check this stuff before hitting POST! ;-)
by orlis on Jul 6, 2009 10:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
haha I completely understand
watchkalibrun.com
by Zak Woods on Jul 7, 2009 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 














