King of the Cage "Vengeance" Results
by Zak Woods on Feb 13, 2010 1:00 AM EST
Email
Print
If anyone had a chance to watch King of the Cage "Vengeance" and can write a fanpost analyzing the production WKR would appreciate it.
Full recap at MMA Recap.
- Mike Kyle def. Travis Wiuff via TKO (doctor's stoppage) - Round 2, 5:00.
- Tony Lopez def. Tyler East via submission (triangle choke) - Round 1, 4:54. Lopez retains the KOTC heavyweight title.
- Donald Sanchez def. Victor Valenzuela via TKO (punches) - Round 4, 4:05. Sanchez retains the KOTC lightweight title
- Abel Cullum def. Joe Coca via submission (kimura) - Round 1, 2:09.Cullum retains the KOTC bantamweight title
- Quinn Mulhern def. Rich Clementi via TKO (punches) - Round 1, 3:09.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
These were some pretty good fights.
Although I think there was controversery at the end, it appeared to me Mike kyle though a punch after the bell knocking Trvis Wiuf silly.,
I wrote a recap of the event
I don’t mind sharing it…here’s the link, I can dedicate a fanpost too if asked :)
http://mmarecap.com/news/Mark_Burnett_Presents_KOTC_Vengeance_On_HDnet_Fights_Recap_And_Results-1028
Inland Empire MMA Examiner
http://www.mmarecap.com
http://www.throwthembows.com
Think for yourself. Your perspective is infinitely more valued than anyone's opinion.
i couldnt get ur link to load for some reason
Im curious as what to what Mark Burnett brings to the table. Im glad he has his foot in the door with mma . I would love for him to create some kind of reality show with mma .
The production was typical of HDnet produced events.
Second only to the UFC. Some small gripes about camera angles but nothing major. Good commentary from the Voice.
HDnet fights always has good production, at least as good as Strikeforce.
HDnet fights always has good production, at least as good as Strikeforce.
not much of an endorsement
watchkalibrun.com
Explain what these guys do wrong Mr Woods.
Other than occassional and ever improving camera direction?
I am really tired of “Not looking like the UFC” = “poorly produced”.
Mike and Goldy are just as goofy with some of the silly stuff they say, so I dearly hope you’re not going to get after Strikeforce’s crew?
by Wolfgangsta on Feb 15, 2010 12:50 AM EST up reply actions
I was just commenting on how most people don’t think very highly of Showtime’s production.
Personally, I think their production is fine minus some of the commentary and lack of pre-fight interviews. But Rogan and Goldie’s commentary isn’t all that great either.
watchkalibrun.com
I disagree most people have a problem with it.
I think most people who voice their opinion on blogs have a problem with it. A very vocal minority. And most of these people also bash Strikeforce for other unrelated reasons, and just expect things to look like the UFC. I believe most of this criticism either comes from a pro-UFC bias or a subconcsious bias in favor of simply looking like the UFC.
This is evidenced by the WEC, who looks more amataur honestly than Strikeforce, getting a total pass and seldom criticized.
It is refreshing to hear someone agree publically that Strikeforce is fine and the commentary in the UFC is just as poor at times.
I think most people who voice their opinion on blogs have a problem with it.
This is probably true
watchkalibrun.com
Just like how Avatar is the most watched movie of all time
but the majority of online discussion is negative reaction to the simple Disney-movie white guilt laced plot.
8 of 10 reviews bash the movie for that.
it was a Dances with Wolves remake (which is a good movie btw) with just really cool effects.
watchkalibrun.com
Ya. But you can't overstate the
complete and utter robbery of many, many Fern Gully plot devices.
They are literally the same movie up until the bulldozer tree cutting machines arive at the respective “home-trees”.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
