Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Super Bowl Recipes: A Guide To The Perfect Game Day Menu

MMA Commission News

Come on Ontario!
Ontario's Premier told reporters that MMA legalization and regulation is 'not a priority'. I guess that puts a kibosh on the UFC holding an event in Toronto any time soon. Update: Mauro Ranallo just went bananas on his radio show over the situation. 

Still Waiting on New York 
New York's Secretary of State, Lorraine Cortes-Vazquez, continues to carry water for Governor's Paterson's budget proposal--specifically the portion that legalizes MMA. Cortes-Vazquez wrote her second op-ed arguing for MMA legalization. Hopefully, the Paterson 'bombshell' won't kill his budget proposal.

Where are the freak fights going to happen?
Holy crap! There is currently a bill in Alabama that would give regulatory powers to the Alabama Boxing Commission (which would be renamed). Where are MMA promoters going to go for their freak shows now? WKR is sort of torn, while this is long overdue without the wild west of Alabama we never would have seen this.

Iowa doesn't regulate amateur MMA?
Kind of shocking that Iowa, a state with deep MMA ties, doesn't actually regulate amateur fights. That may change as the Iowa state senate unanimously passed a bill to regulate amateur MMA. The bill still needs to pass the house.

Currently forty-three states regulate MMA.

Comment 3 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It’s “Paterson.” One “t.”

by LuvForTheGuv on Feb 17, 2010 1:02 PM EST reply actions  

I think I am blind…

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Feb 17, 2010 1:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Here's the deal with Ontario:

The Criminal Code of Canada specifically forbids “prize fighting,” but gives an exemption for “boxing contests” as long as they’re regulated by the local athletic commission. Obviously the wording “boxing contest” is a problem. Several other provinces and cities have basically decided not to take that phrase literally… the rationale is that MMA didn’t exist when the law was written, but as long as it’s regulated by the athletic commission, it meets the intent of the law and falls under the same exemption.

But the head of the Ontario athletic commission, Ken Hayashi, insists on taking it literally, claims MMA is not a “boxing contest” and therefore doesn’t meet the legal exemption. The truth is that he just doesn’t like MMA, and it’s a convenient excuse for him to hide behind and claim it’s out of his hands. He’s careful how he talks about it now, but I’ve read that he and others on the commission have said in the past that they won’t regulate MMA because they think it’s barbaric and such.

So the bottom line is that nothing will change until either Hayashi is replaced, or the premier decides to pressure him to change his stance. But apparently that’s not a priority for the premier right now.

by agentsmith on Feb 17, 2010 2:36 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Innovative, incisive and independent MMA coverage

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Recent Posts


Managers

65723_10150356329605118_56420715117_16038946_2222608_n_small Zak Woods

Editors

Chicagoatnight1_small Zach Krantz

St6_small David St. Martin

Scmlogo2_small S.C. Michaelson

Contributors

Evan_tanner_small Kaleb Kelchner

Wearealone_small Derek Suboticki