Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Raiders' GM Begins The Purge

Viral Reebok Ads are Disturbing...

Liddell-reebok_medium

TMZ.com reports that the Chuck Liddell and Heidi Northcott naked, workout, peeping tom video is part of a viral marketing campaign...okay....

There are two ways to look at this.

First, this is a highly effective means of getting people to talk about your subject. Michael David Smith makes the point that the video succeeded in creating "buzz" around Chuck Liddell; a person who represents a sport outside of the mainstream consciousness. If your end all be all is people talking --no matter the subject or context-- then kudos to you.

The second way to perceive this video is a successful "buzz" creator yet ultimately flawed on two levels. The first level is a failure to realize that the conversation started by the "buzz" is inherently negative. The general population is repulsed by the action of a peeping tom (read the comment section for the clip from Jimmy Kimmel) and even if it was orchestrated it still leaves a sour taste in the mouth. Not to mention the fact that the video places the viewer in the shoes of a peeping tom; an action that is considered morally reprehensible by our society and as result, viewers walk away with negative feelings. 

The second level is a failure to frame the subject or product in a positive light. If anything, the pervasive view is that Liddell and Northcott are bizarre at best or fundamentally different. In marketing is very rarely a smart thing to make your subject or product "otherly". The question WKR saw the most was "why" and even if it is explained away as viral marketing the question lingers, as most people wouldn't agree to be filmed doing pull-ups with their exposed gluteus maximus being recorded for distribution online. Then there is the general repulsion that most viewers have exhibited after seeing 98% of Liddell's skin.

If you couldn't tell already WKR is trending towards the second viewpoint.

So, congratulations Reebok, you got people talking in a negative and repulsed manner about your asset while placing the viewer in the shoes of voyeuristic peeping tom, something that fundamentally causes a visceral reaction. Excellent idea...now where are my Pumas.

WKR will now get back to your normal MMA programming.

Comment 3 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Man chuck must have some small nuts ‘cause my nuts would’ve been hanging/danglin down and that circle would’ve instead incased them instead of the sneakers.

by Lil Pinga on Feb 26, 2010 11:58 AM EST reply actions  

Ha! Back when I played basketball in school, I was all about the Pump!

by Steve W on Feb 26, 2010 7:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Innovative, incisive and independent MMA coverage

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Recent Posts


Managers

65723_10150356329605118_56420715117_16038946_2222608_n_small Zak Woods

Editors

Chicagoatnight1_small Zach Krantz

St6_small David St. Martin

Scmlogo2_small S.C. Michaelson

Contributors

Evan_tanner_small Kaleb Kelchner

Wearealone_small Derek Suboticki