Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

MMA Fashion Apparel Poll

                                                  Shleebling1-798182_medium

Promoted to the Front Page by Zak Woods

If any of you recall in my recent FanPost  on the Strikeforce: Miami event I attended, I made note of the large number of people that were wearing Affliction or TapOut apparel. The day following the event, I considered going to a GSP/Affliction signing in Miami where you had to have made a purchase of $50 or more within the month of January--day of signing included. Due to time constraints, I was not able to make it. However had I been able to, I no doubt would have dropped the $50 on a GSP T-shirt just to have him sign (not to wear).

 I don't know if that would have made me a hypocrite, since I slammed a bunch of people that were wearing Affliction and/or TapOut shirts the night prior, but to me it seems okay to wear (or just collect) one as long as it has a fighters name on it, particularly one you are a fan of. Just wearing said name brands as fashion looks pretty toolish though (in my opinion). Much like when people wearing MMA camp shirts in public when they don't even train (a lot of guys down here who don't train wear ATT & Gracie shirts).

So, my question to all you opinionated WKR readers is the following:

Poll
What is the criteria for wearing MMA apparel without looking like a tool?
Wearing any MMA apparel without training is lame.
31 votes
Wearing MMA apparel is ok if you don't train as long as you are a fan of the fighter who's shirt you are wearing.
74 votes
All those shirts suck and are for tools & fist-pumpers like the guys on "Jersey Shore".
54 votes
I don't wear any of that whack stuff. I sport Bugle Boy, Cross Colors, & Z. Cavaricci. Recognize!!!!
5 votes
Other (comment below)
10 votes

174 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 14 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

To me, it’s about making it work…

You see a guy like Mauro Ranallo wearing low-key MMA shirts under a blazer or jacket all the time, and it looks solid. He’s supporting a brand, the sport and/or a fighter, but not looking like a Jersey Shore douche.

The problem – as I see it as well – is the collection of morons who live the “I wear MMA gear and that makes me tough” mantra, training or not. Not is, of course, far worse, but even if you train, there is no need to be a douche about it.

by E. Spencer Kyte on Feb 9, 2010 2:04 PM EST reply actions  

is the collection of morons who live the "I wear MMA gear and that makes me tough" mantra, training or not.

Agreed, also there is the segment of fans who wear muscle shirts and really shouldn’t….but that is true everywhere

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Feb 9, 2010 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

So should I not wear a Metallica shirt if I dont play instruments or sing?

by BobOBuilder on Feb 9, 2010 2:16 PM EST reply actions  

touché

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Feb 9, 2010 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

So long as wearing the shirt doesn’t make you think you’re instantly transformed into the best guitar player this side of Kirk Hammett…

by E. Spencer Kyte on Feb 9, 2010 7:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Personally I just don’t like a lot of MMA fashion right now.

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Feb 9, 2010 2:34 PM EST reply actions  

lol i had similar thoughts when i was at ufc 101, i seriously could not believe i enjoyed the same sport as about 80% of the crowd that were complete jersey shore type douchebags.

seemed that the dweeby, nerdy (me) guys in the crowd had fighter shirts on (bj penn mostly, sparce florian and anderson shirts and a few fedor shirts) and the douche crowd had the affliction/tapout gear on now i think about it.

i did buy a bj penn shirt for 35 bucks at the show that no longer fits me.

"Newspapermen ask dumb questions. They look up at the sun and ask if it is shining."
-Sonny Liston

.

by sonofapsycho on Feb 9, 2010 2:41 PM EST reply actions  

Not so sure about this as the same argument could be made about other clothing like school name clothing (Harvard, Penn St., Michigan, etc.), military clothing,,baseball, football, etc. I personally wouldn’t drop more than perhaps $20 on a T-shirt a baseball or football jersey, a polo, or casual or dress shirt yes. I baseball (yankees, Indians) and football (Bears (34) and Giants (56)) and I haven’t played baseball and “football” since I was a kid and I’m assuming not many people who were any sort of sport apparell actually play the game. I live in NYC and quite frankly, I haven’t seen anyone wearing an MMA t-shirt or perhaps didn’t care to, but perhaps if I go to Long Island. It’ll be a different story.

by Lil Pinga on Feb 9, 2010 2:51 PM EST reply actions  

I think that the Affliction and Tapout brands started off well, but for whatever reason were taken over by the d-bag element. I don’t necessarily think its the fault of the brands, but at this point, wearing one of those shirts if you’re not paid to do it could be hazardous to your social life.

by Donna on Feb 9, 2010 3:20 PM EST reply actions  

Fifty dollar tshirts can kiss my ass. It’s no different from Ed Hardy gear. I’ve been goofing on these things since they first came out.

 Wear what you want to wear, but no thanks, I’ll pass.

"Donuts don't wear alligator shoes" - Black Dynamite

by Greenbeard on Feb 9, 2010 3:36 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Ed Hardy is a whole new level.

@fjbar on twitter...formerly El Mexicutioner

by _Felix_ on Feb 9, 2010 3:38 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

A good shirt is a good shirt.

Doesn’t matter if it’s a band shirt, a fighter shirt, a cartoon shirt, whatever.

by gocjeffe on Feb 9, 2010 8:03 PM EST reply actions  

If I find a shirt that I like – which means it isn’t over the top gaudy, isn’t covered in skulls, etc. – and (MOST IMPORTANTLY) is a brand that I know supports fighters who need it, I’m likely to buy one or two (total; I’d never have more than that at a time). Why? Because I know fighters who are sponsored by some of these clothing lines, and that those sponsorships can make a difference between having the money to pay rent, eat and train or having to choose which of those is too expensive. Besides, I don’t hang out with the d-bag groups that wear the ugly, gaudy shit en masse, so it’s not like I’m trying to fit in with a crowd or demographic. If there were lots of those people where I am or in my social circles, I’d probably reconsider how I go about putting money back into the fighters’ corner – buying different kinds of products, etc. – but as things stand I see no problem with “voting with my dollars”, ie. supporting companies who support my friends who train their asses off.

"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."

by AJB on Feb 10, 2010 8:32 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Innovative, incisive and independent MMA coverage

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Recent Posts


Managers

65723_10150356329605118_56420715117_16038946_2222608_n_small Zak Woods

Editors

Chicagoatnight1_small Zach Krantz

St6_small David St. Martin

Scmlogo2_small S.C. Michaelson

Contributors

Evan_tanner_small Kaleb Kelchner

Wearealone_small Derek Suboticki